Preemptive Habitat Destruction under the Endangered Species Act
- 1 April 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The Journal of Law and Economics
- Vol. 46 (1), 27-60
- https://doi.org/10.1086/344670
Abstract
This paper examines the extent to which landowners have preemptively destroyed habitat for the endangered red‐cockaded woodpeckers (RCWs) in the forests of North Carolina in order to avoid potential land‐use regulations prescribed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Under the ESA, it is illegal to kill an endangered species and it is also illegal to damage its habitat. By preventing the establishment of an old‐growth pine stand, landowners can ensure that RCWs do not inhabit their land and avoid ESA regulations that limit or prohibit timber harvest activity. Data from 1984–90 on over 1,000 individual forest plots are used to test predictions about the probability of harvest and the age of timber when it is harvested. We find that increases in the proximity of a plot to RCWs increases the probability that the plot will be harvested and decreases the age at which the forest is harvested.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Self‐Regulation and Social Welfare: The Political Economy of Corporate EnvironmentalismThe Journal of Law and Economics, 2000
- The Economics of Takings and Compensation When Land and Its Public Use Value Are in Private HandsLand Economics, 2000
- Waiting to Be Protected Under the Endangered Species Act: The Political Economy of Regulatory DelayThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1999
- Takings, Compensation and Endangered Species Protection on Private LandsJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1998
- THE ECONOMICS OF COMPENSATING PROPERTY OWNERSContemporary Economic Policy, 1997
- Takings, Compensation, and Equal Treatment for Owners of Developed and Undeveloped PropertyThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1997
- The Economic Consequences of Regulatory Taking Risk on Land Value and Development ActivityJournal of Urban Economics, 1997
- The Endangered Species Act: A Case Study in Takings & IncentivesStanford Law Review, 1997
- Production Economics of Private Forestry: A Comparison of Industrial and Nonindustrial Forest OwnersAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1993
- Longleaf Pines Used for Cavities by Red-Cockaded WoodpeckersThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1988