Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments
- 26 January 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in The Linguistic Review
- Vol. 18 (1-2), 9-50
- https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.19.1-2.9
Abstract
This article examines a type of argument for linguistic nativism that takes the following form: (i) a fact about some natural language is exhibited that allegedly could not be learned from experience without access to a certain kind of (positive) data; (ii) it is claimed that data of the type in question are not found in normal linguistic experience; hence (iii) it is concluded that people cannot be learning the language from mere exposure to language use. We analyze the components of this sort of argument carefully, and examine four exemplars, none of which hold up. We conclude that linguists have some additional work to do if they wish to sustain their claims about having provided support for linguistic nativism, and we offer some reasons for thinking that the relevant kind of future work on this issue is likely to further undermine the linguistic nativist position.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Language Acquisition and Use: Learning and Applying Probabilistic ConstraintsScience, 1997
- About 37% of Word-Tokens are NounsLanguage, 1994
- Prenominal adjectives and the phrasal/lexical distinctionJournal of Linguistics, 1994
- Negative evidence in language acquisitionCognition, 1993
- Structure Dependence in Grammar FormationLanguage, 1987
- Level-ordering in lexical developmentCognition, 1985
- The Plausibility of RationalismThe Journal of Philosophy, 1984
- Auxiliaries and Related Phenomena in a Restrictive Theory of GrammarLanguage, 1982
- Autonomous Syntax and the Analysis of AuxiliariesLanguage, 1977
- Language identification in the limitInformation and Control, 1967