Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultrasonography, and mammography for tumor extension of breast cancer
- 12 January 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
- Vol. 112 (3), 461-474
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-008-9890-y
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Mammography, Clinical Examination, US, and MR Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Breast CancerRadiology, 2004
- Magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of breast cancer: a comparative study with mammography and ultrasonographyJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2004
- Value of Three-Dimensional Helical CT Image-Guided Planning for Made-to-Order Lumpectomy in Breast Cancer PatientsThe Breast Journal, 2004
- Three-Dimensional Helical CT of the Breast: Accuracy for Measuring Extent of Breast Cancer Candidates for Breast Conserving SurgeryBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2001
- Role of ultrasonography in the detection of intraductal spread of breast cancer: correlation with pathologic findings , mammography and MR imagingEuropean Radiology, 2000
- Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast‐conserving therapyCancer, 1996
- Patient selection for breast conservation therapy with magnification mammographySurgery, 1995
- The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long term results of breast conservationCancer, 1995
- The Optimal Extent of Resection for Patients With Stages I or II Breast Cancer Treated With Conservative Surgery and RadiotherapyAnnals of Surgery, 1991
- Treatment of Early-Stage Breast CancerJAMA, 1991