Ethical issues in pandemic planning
- 20 November 2006
- journal article
- review article
- Published by AMPCo in The Medical Journal of Australia
- Vol. 185 (S10), S73-S76
- https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00713.x
Abstract
In the event of an influenza pandemic, many ethical issues will arise in terms of health risks, resource allocation, and management decisions. Planning decisions may be controversial, such as rationing of antivirals, resource allocation (including hospital beds and vaccinations), occupational risk, rostering of staff, responsibilities of health care workers, quarantine measures, and governance issues. A clear ethical framework is needed to enable understanding of the decision‐making process and optimise acceptance of decisions by health care workers and other members of an affected community. Planning decisions need to start being examined now, and will require input from a broad group of experts: health care providers, infrastructure managers, lawyers, ethicists, public health physicians, and community members. The process will need to be open, honest and dynamic.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Who Should Get Influenza Vaccine When Not All Can?Science, 2006
- On pandemics and the duty to care: whose duty? who cares?BMC Medical Ethics, 2006
- The impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome on medical house staff a qualitative studyJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2005
- How far does a doctor's 'duty of care' go?Internal Medicine Journal, 2005
- Ethical Challenges in Preparing for Bioterrorism: Barriers Within the Health Care SystemAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2004
- SARS Control and Psychological Effects of Quarantine, Toronto, CanadaEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2004
- The Lessons of SARSAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2003
- Challenging beliefs and ethical concepts: the collateral damage of SARSCritical Care, 2003
- Declarations made by graduating medical students in Australia and New ZealandThe Medical Journal of Australia, 2002