Revisiting impulsivity in suicide: Implications for civil liability of third parties
- 27 November 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Behavioral Sciences & the Law
- Vol. 26 (6), 779-797
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.848
Abstract
Previous research and popular conceptualizations of suicide have posited that many suicides are the result of impulsive, “on a whim” decisions. However, recent research demonstrates that most suicides are not attempted impulsively, and in fact involve a plan. Legally, suicide has historically been considered to be a superseding intervening cause of death that exonerates other parties from liability, but currently there are two general exceptions to this view. Specifically, another party may be found responsible for a suicide if that party either caused the suicide or failed in its duty to prevent the suicide from occurring. Both of these exceptions assume that the resulting suicide was foreseeable. Given that recent research has indicated that most suicides are planned, and thereby foreseeable to a certain extent under many circumstances, this article discusses issues of foreseeability as they pertain to litigation involving third party liability for the suicide of university students, prison inmates, and mental health patients. The authors contend that the surest way for universities, prison staff, and mental health practitioners to avoid being held liable for a suicide is to appropriately assess for suicidal intent. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Suicidal desire and the capability for suicide: Tests of the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior among adults.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2008
- Behind impulsive suicide attempts: Indications from a community studyJournal of Affective Disorders, 2007
- Suicide by prisonersThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2004
- Characteristics of Impulsive Suicide Attempts and AttemptersSuicide and Life-Threatening Behavior, 2002
- Factor structure of the barratt impulsiveness scaleJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1995
- The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.Psychological Bulletin, 1995
- The opponent-process theory of acquired motivation: The costs of pleasure and the benefits of pain.American Psychologist, 1980
- The nucleoli of cultured human lymphocytes: I. Nucleolar morphology in relation to transformation and the DNA cycleExperimental Cell Research, 1976
- Adult Age and Cautiousness in DecisionHuman Development, 1976
- An opponent-process theory of motivation: I. Temporal dynamics of affect.Psychological Review, 1974