Is Bridge to Recovery More Likely With Pulsatile Left Ventricular Assist Devices Than With Nonpulsatile-Flow Systems?
- 31 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
- Vol. 91 (5), 1335-1340
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.027
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Centrifugal, Axial, and Pulsatile Left Ventricular Assist Device Support on End-Organ Function in Heart Failure PatientsThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2009
- End-organ Function in Patients on Long-term Circulatory Support With Continuous- or Pulsatile-flow Assist DevicesThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2007
- Results of a multicenter clinical trial with the Thoratec Implantable Ventricular Assist DeviceThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2007
- Left Ventricular Assist Device and Drug Therapy for the Reversal of Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Reverse Remodeling of the Myocardial Extracellular Matrix After Prolonged Left Ventricular Assist Device Support Follows a Biphasic PatternThe Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation, 2006
- Healing the heart with ventricular assist device therapy: mechanisms of cardiac recoveryThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2001
- Left ventricular assist system as a bridge to myocardial recoveryThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1999
- Low Incidence of Myocardial Recovery After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients With Chronic Heart FailureCirculation, 1998
- Weaning From Mechanical Cardiac Support in Patients With Idiopathic Dilated CardiomyopathyCirculation, 1997
- Reversal of Chronic Ventricular Dilation in Patients With End-Stage Cardiomyopathy by Prolonged Mechanical UnloadingCirculation, 1995