A comparison of three different entry techniques in gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized prospective trial
- 1 December 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 171 (2), 339-342
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.09.012
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Practice of endoscopic gynecologic surgery: a survey of Spanish gynecologistsEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2013
- Direct Trocar versus Veress Needle Entry for Laparoscopy: A Randomized Clinical TrialGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 2010
- Laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical guideline, national survey, and medicolegal ramificationsSurgical Endoscopy, 2008
- Complications of laparoscopic surgery: How to avoid them and how to repair themJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2006
- Trocar-associated injuries and fatalities: An analysis of 1399 reports to the FDAJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2005
- An evaluation of four tests used to ascertain Veres needle placement at closed laparoscopyJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2005
- The Safety and Efficacy of Direct Trocar Insertion With Elevation of the Rectus Sheath Instead of the Skin for PneumoperitoneumSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2005
- Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 2003
- Efficacy of Establishment of Pneumoperitoneum with the Veress Needle, Hasson Trocar, and Modified Blunt Trocar (TrocDoc): A Randomized StudyJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2000
- Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1997