Structured analysis, evaluation and report of the emergency response to a terrorist attack in Wuerzburg, Germany using a new template of standardised quality indicators
Open Access
- 19 October 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 26 (1), 87
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0555-5
Abstract
BackgroundUntil now there has been a reported lack of systematic reports and scientific evaluations of rescue missions during terror attacks. This however is urgently required in order to improve the performance of emergency medical services and to be able to compare different missions with each other. Aim of the presented work was to report the systematic evaluation and the lessons learned from the response to a terror attack that happened in Wuerzburg, Germany in 2016.MethodsA team of 14 experts developed a template of quality indicators and operational characteristics, which allow for the description, assessment and comparison of civil emergency rescue missions during mass killing incidents. The entire systematic evaluation process consisted of three main steps. The first step was the systematic data collection according to the quality indicators and operational characteristics. Second was the systematic stratification and assessment of the data. The last step was the prioritisation of the identified weaknesses and the definition of the lessons learned.ResultsFive important lessons learned have been defined. First of all, a comprehensive concept for rescue missions during terror attacks is essential. Furthermore, the establishment of a defined high priority communication infrastructure between the different dispatch centres (red phone) is vital. The goal is to secure the continuity of information between a few well-defined individuals. Thirdly, the organization of the incident scene needs to be commonly decided and communicated between police, medical services and fire services during the mission. A successful mission tactic requires continuous flux of reports to the on-site command post. Therefore, a predefined and common communication infrastructure for all operational forces is a crucial point. Finally, all strategies need to be extensively trained before the real life scenario hits.ConclusionAccording to a systematic evaluation, we defined the lessons learned from a terror attack in 2016. Further systematic reports and academic work surrounding life threatening rescue missions and mass killing incidents are needed in order to ultimately improve such mission outcomes. In the future, a close international collaboration might help to find the best database to report and evaluate major incidents but also mass killing events.This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The French emergency medical services after the Paris and Nice terrorist attacks: what have we learnt?The Lancet, 2017
- Preparing for the Next Terrorism AttackJAMA Surgery, 2017
- Qualitätsindikatoren für rettungsdienstliche Einsätze bei Terroranschlägen oder anderen Bedrohungslagen Quality indicators for rescue operations in terrorist attacks or other threatsDer Anaesthesist, 2017
- Trials and tribulations: how we established a major incident databaseScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2017
- French Ministry of Health’s response to Paris attacks of 13 November 2015Critical Care, 2016
- Report from ParisThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- The medical response to multisite terrorist attacks in ParisThe Lancet, 2015
- A consensus based template for reporting of pre-hospital major incident medical managementScandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 2014
- Systematic literature review of templates for reporting prehospital major incident medical managementBMJ Open, 2013
- DISAST-CIR: Disastrous Incidents Systematic Analysis Through Components, Interactions and Results: Application to a Large-Scale Train AccidentThe Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2009