Can Qualitative Research Produce Reliable Quantitative Findings?
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Field Methods
- Vol. 13 (1), 3-19
- https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x0101300101
Abstract
This article asks whether qualitative anthropological research using rapid methods can produce results as reliable and valid as those derived from expensive sample surveys, at least under certain circumstances. The discussion focuses on nonformal sampling or informant selection techniques on which anthropologists rely. To help answer the question, the author describes two relatively low-cost, rapid, qualitative studies in applied medical anthropology in Swaziland and in the Palestinian Territories. Although random sample surveys have become the gold standard for most policy makers dealing with KAP (knowledge, attitudes, and practices) data, qualitative research can form the basis of policy or program decisions under certain conditions.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Participant Recruitment for Qualitative Research: A Site-Based Approach to Community Research in Complex SocietiesHuman Organization, 1999
- Perceptions of Pesticide Associated Cancer Risks among Farmers: A Qualitative AssessmentHuman Organization, 1998
- Sampling Strategies for the Collection of Cultural Data: An Extension of Boas's Answer to Galton's ProblemCurrent Anthropology, 1997
- Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Model Infant Feeding Behavior among Navajo MothersHuman Organization, 1996
- Diarrhea and the social marketing of oral rehydration salts in BangladeshSocial Science & Medicine (1982), 1986
- Beliefs and behaviour related to water in rural SwazilandInternational Journal of Water Resources Development, 1984