Evaluation of modern pathological criteria for positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens and their use for predicting biochemical recurrence
- 16 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 103 (3), 327-331
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2008.08075.x
Abstract
To assess the interpretation of modern criteria for evaluating surgical margins (SMs), by examining the incidence of positive SMs (PSMs) and subsequent biochemical recurrence in a single-surgeon series of radical prostatectomy (RP) at two institutions, as the criteria for determining PSMs after RP are subject to individual interpretation, and this might explain some of the variability in biochemical recurrence rates with different rates of PSMs. We reviewed 301 consecutive perineal RPs by one surgeon (T.K.) at Emory University Hospital (EUH) and the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), with each pathology department using modern criteria to evaluate the SMs. The SM status and biochemical recurrence (BCR) were analysed, the latter defined as a prostate-specific antigen level of > or =0.2 ng/mL. There were 158 perineal RPs at EUH followed by 143 at MUSC. PSMs were reported in 39 patients (24.7%) at EUH, whereas six (4.2%) were positive at MUSC. The overall BCR rates were similar between the groups, but BCR within margin-positive cases was 100% at MUSC vs 25.6% at EUH (P < 0.01). The presence of tumour at <1 mm from the margin did not increase the rate of BCR compared to those with obvious negative SMs (P = 0.731). In this single-surgeon series, using the same criteria to evaluate the SMs resulted in significantly different PSM rates and margin-positive BCR rates between the institutions. Although the reason for these differences is difficult to determine, the study shows clearly that tumour within 1 mm of the margin should not be classified as margin-positive.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of pathology review of stage and margin status of radical prostatectomy specimens (EORTC trial 22911)Virchows Archiv, 2006
- Influence of margin status and radiation on recurrence after radical hysterectomy in Stage IB cervical cancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2006
- Prostate Specific Antigen Recurrence Rates are Low After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy and Positive MarginsJournal of Urology, 2006
- DO MARGINS MATTER? THE PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENSJournal of Urology, 2005
- Importance of margin extent as a predictor of outcome after adjuvant radiotherapy for Gleason score 7 pT3N0 prostate cancerInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2004
- Variations Among Individual Surgeons in the Rate of Positive Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy SpecimensJournal of Urology, 2003
- The role of the pathologist in the evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimensScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 2003
- The Influence of Margin Width on Local Control of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the BreastNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organconfined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomyUrology, 1997
- Prediction of Progression Following Radical ProstatectomyThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1996