A Standardized Terminology for Describing Reproductive Development in Fishes
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 1 January 2011
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Marine and Coastal Fisheries
- Vol. 3 (1), 52-70
- https://doi.org/10.1080/19425120.2011.555724
Abstract
As the number of fish reproduction studies has proliferated, so has the number of gonadal classification schemes and terms. This has made it difficult for both scientists and resource managers to communicate and for comparisons to be made among studies. We propose the adoption of a simple, universal terminology for the phases in the reproductive cycle, which can be applied to all male and female elasmobranch and teleost fishes. These phases were chosen because they define key milestones in the reproductive cycle; the phases include immature, developing, spawning capable, regressing, and regenerating. Although the temporal sequence of events during gamete development in each phase may vary among species, each phase has specific histological and physiological markers and is conceptually universal. The immature phase can occur only once. The developing phase signals entry into the gonadotropin‐dependent stage of oogenesis and spermatogenesis and ultimately results in gonadal growth. The spawning capable phase includes (1) those fish with gamete development that is sufficiently advanced to allow for spawning within the current reproductive cycle and (2) batch‐spawning females that show signs of previous spawns (i.e., postovulatory follicle complex) and that are also capable of additional spawns during the current cycle. Within the spawning capable phase, an actively spawning subphase is defined that corresponds to hydration and ovulation in females and spermiation in males. The regressing phase indicates completion of the reproductive cycle and, for many fish, completion of the spawning season. Fish in the regenerating phase are sexually mature but reproductively inactive. Species‐specific histological criteria or classes can be incorporated within each of the universal phases, allowing for more specific divisions (subphases) while preserving the overall reproductive terminology for comparative purposes. This terminology can easily be modified for fishes with alternate reproductive strategies, such as hermaphrodites (addition of a transition phase) and livebearers (addition of a gestation phase).Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Red Snapper Reproductive Biology in the Southern Gulf of MexicoTransactions of the American Fisheries Society, 2010
- Identification of differentially expressed ovarian genes during primary and early secondary oocyte growth in coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutchReproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 2008
- Ovary development in Greenland halibut Reinhardtius hippoglossoides in west Greenland watersJournal of Fish Biology, 2005
- Particularities of reproduction and oogenesis in teleost fish compared to mammalsReproduction Nutrition Development, 2005
- Mating systems and the conservation of commercially exploited marine fishTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 2003
- Annual changes in germinal epithelium determine male reproductive classes of the cobiaJournal of Fish Biology, 2002
- Reproductive cycle of female Brazilian codling, Urophycis brasiliensis (Kaup 1858), caught off the Uruguayan coastJournal of Applied Ichthyology, 2000
- Maturity classification and growth of capelin, Mallotus villosus villosus (M), oocytesJournal of Fish Biology, 1983
- Viviparity: The Maternal-Fetal Relationship in FishesAmerican Zoologist, 1981
- Cellular and Dynamic Aspects of Oocyte Growth in TeleostsAmerican Zoologist, 1981