Revisiting youden's index as a useful measure of the misclassification error in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies
- 28 March 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Statistical Methods in Medical Research
- Vol. 17 (6), 543-554
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280207081867
Abstract
The paper considers meta-analysis of diagnostic studies that use a continuous score for classification of study participants into healthy or diseased groups. Classification is often done on the basis of a threshold or cut-off value, which might vary between studies. Consequently, conventional meta-analysis methodology focusing solely on separate analysis of sensitivity and specificity might be confounded by a potentially unknown variation of the cut-off value. To cope with this phenomena it is suggested to use, instead, an overall estimate of the misclassification error previously suggested and used as Youden's index and; furthermore, it is argued that this index is less prone to between-study variation of cut-off values. A simple Mantel—Haenszel estimator as a summary measure of the overall misclassification error is suggested, which adjusts for a potential study effect. The measure of the misclassification error based on Youden's index is advantageous in that it easily allows an extension to a likelihood approach, which is then able to cope with unobserved heterogeneity via a nonparametric mixture model. All methods are illustrated at hand of an example on a diagnostic meta-analysis on duplex doppler ultrasound, with angiography as the standard for stroke prevention.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- The Application of Statistical Methods of Meta-Analysis for Heterogeneity Modelling in Medicine and Pharmacy, Psychology, Quality Control and AssurancePublished by Springer Science and Business Media LLC ,2003
- A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluationsStatistics in Medicine, 2001
- Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening testsBMJ, 2001
- Meta-Analysis in Medicine and Health PolicyPublished by Taylor & Francis Ltd ,2000
- Meta-analysis: formulating, evaluating, combining, and reportingStatistics in Medicine, 1999
- Meta-analysis of screening and diagnostic tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1995
- Guidelines for Meta-analyses Evaluating Diagnostic TestsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1994
- A bivariate approach to meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- A Meta-analytic Method for Summarizing Diagnostic Test PerformancesMedical Decision Making, 1993