Myth 94: Qualitative Health Researchers will Agree about Validity
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Qualitative Health Research
- Vol. 11 (4), 538-552
- https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230101100409
Abstract
In a recent editorial, Morse warned against qualitative health researchers turning their backs on fundamental concepts such as validity and called on them to think, reconsider, and undo. With a view to stimulating further dialogue, in this article the author explores where this thinking, reconsidering, and undoing might take us in relation to the concept of validity. Four perspectives on this issue are presented for discussion: the replication, parallel, diversification, and letting-go perspectives. Each is seen as worthy of consideration in its own right, and it is suggested that coexistence of the perspectives is possible despite their differences. The implications of various forms of coexistence are discussed in relation to the problem of criteria. It is recommended that qualitative health researchers learn to judge a variety of approaches in different but appropriate ways.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Myth #93: Reliability and Validity Are Not Relevant to Qualitative InquiryQualitative Health Research, 1999
- The Stories Educational Researchers Tell About ThemselvesEducational Researcher, 1997
- On the Aesthetics of Qualitative ResearchImage: the Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1995
- Validity and Self-Reflexivity Meet Poststructuralism: Scientific Ethos and the Transgressive SelfEducational Researcher, 1995
- Negotiated Validity in Collaborative EthnographyQualitative Inquiry, 1995
- Fidelity as a criterion for practicing and evaluating narrative inquiryInternational Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 1995
- Critical Ethnography in Education: Origins, Current Status, and New DirectionsReview of Educational Research, 1989
- The Evaluator/Researcher as Person vs. the Person as Evaluator/ResearcherEducational Researcher, 1988
- Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft placeInterchange, 1986
- The Problem of Criteria for Judging Interpretive InquiryEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1984