The Vast Majority Of Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Still Don’t Choose The Cheapest Plans That Meet Their Medication Needs
Open Access
- 1 October 2012
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 31 (10), 2259-2265
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0087
Abstract
The Medicare Part D program allows beneficiaries to choose among Part D plans administered by different health plans in order to encourage market competition and give beneficiaries more flexibility. Currently around 40–50 Part D plans are available per region. When faced with so many options, do beneficiaries generally choose the least expensive plan? Using 2009 Part D data, we found that only 5.2% of beneficiaries chose the cheapest plan. Nationwide, beneficiaries on average spent $368 more annually than they would have spent under the cheapest plan available in their region, given their medication needs. Beneficiaries often overprotected themselves by paying higher premiums for plan features they did not need, such as generic drug coverage in the coverage gap. Our findings suggest that beneficiaries need more targeted assistance from the government to choose plans, for example, a customized letter indicating three top plans based on beneficiaries’ medication needs.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE WELFARE IMPACT OF REDUCING CHOICE IN MEDICARE PART D: A COMPARISON OF TWO REGULATION STRATEGIES*International Economic Review, 2012
- Sources of Regional Variation in Medicare Part D Drug SpendingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Choice Inconsistencies among the Elderly: Evidence from Plan Choice in the Medicare Part D ProgramAmerican Economic Review, 2011
- Reducing the Number of Drug Plans for Seniors: A Proposal and Analysis of Three Case StudiesJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2010
- Geographic Variation in the Quality of PrescribingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Geographic Variation in Medicare Drug SpendingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review, 1996
- Status quo bias in decision makingJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1988