Factors affecting the comparability of meta-analyses and largest trials results in perinatology
- 1 September 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 50 (9), 997-1002
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(97)00148-0
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Misleading meta-analysisBMJ, 1995
- Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trialsThe Lancet, 1995
- Do small trials square with large ones?The Lancet, 1995
- Calcium supplementation during pregnancy: a systematic review of randomised controlled trialsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1994
- CLASP: a randomised trial of low-dose aspirin for the prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia among 9364 pregnant womenThe Lancet, 1994
- Meta-analysis: State-of-the-ScienceEpidemiologic Reviews, 1992
- Management of retained placenta by umbilical vein injectionBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991
- Statistical Tools for Subset Analysis in Clinical TrialsRecent Results in Cancer Research, 1988
- Significance QuestingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979