Public information needs after the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko with polonium-210 in London: cross sectional telephone survey and qualitative analysis
- 1 November 2007
- Vol. 335 (7630), 1143
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39367.455243.be
Abstract
Objectives To identify public perceptions of the risk to health after the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko with polonium-210 (210Po) in London and to assess the impact of public health communications. Design Cross sectional telephone survey and qualitative interviews. Setting London, United Kingdom. Participants 1000 people completed the cross sectional survey and 86 potentially exposed people completed the qualitative interviews. Main outcome measures Perception of risk to personal health after the 210Po incident. Qualitative interviews were analysed with an emphasis on information needs. Results 11.7% of the survey sample (n=117) perceived their health to be at risk. Aside from personal variables the main predictors of perceived risk to health were believing that the incident was related to terrorism (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 4.6) rather than to espionage, that it was targeted at the wider public rather than one person (5.9, 3.2 to 10.9), and that it could affect people who had not been in the contaminated area (3.2, 2.1 to 5.1). Participants in the qualitative interviews were generally satisfied with the information they had received, although they would have preferred more information about their individual risk of exposure, the results of their urine tests, and the health implications of the incident. Conclusions Perceptions of the public that the 210Po incident in London in 2006 was related to espionage helped to reassure them that the risks to personal health were low. In the event of future incidents it is important to ensure that detailed, comprehensible information about the risks of any exposure is available.This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Polonium-210 Poisoning in LondonJournal of Radiological Protection, 2007
- Effect of providing information about normal test results on patients' reassurance: randomised controlled trialBMJ, 2007
- Possible selection effects for radiation risk estimates in Japanese A-bomb survivors: reanalysis of acute radiation symptoms dataRadiation and Environmental Biophysics, 2006
- Toward a framework for understanding lay public’s comprehension of disaster and bioterrorism informationJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2005
- Travel Risks in a Time of Terror: Judgments and ChoicesRisk Analysis, 2004
- Emergency Communication and Information Issues in Terrorist Events Involving Radioactive MaterialsBiosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 2004
- Breaking New Ground in WMD Risk Communication: The Pre-Event Message Development ProjectBiosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science, 2004
- The impact of anthrax attacks on the American public.2002
- Leverage-Saliency Theory of Survey ParticipationPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2000
- Information needs and preference for information of women with breast cancer over a first course of radiation therapyPatient Education and Counseling, 1999