For the Sake of Inquiry and Knowledge — The Inevitability of Open Access
- 28 February 2013
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in The New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 368 (9), 785-787
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1211410
Abstract
It's difficult to have a measured conversation about open access — the term widely used to refer to unrestricted online access to articles published in scholarly journals. People who believe that free and unrestricted access to peer-reviewed journal articles will undermine the viability of scholarly journal publishing disagree sharply with those who believe that only open access can expedite research advances and ensure the availability of that same scholarly literature. Arguments for and against open access tend to focus on implementation details, ignoring the powerful motivations underlying the phenomenon.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Creative Commons and the Openness of Open AccessThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- The Downside of Open-Access PublishingThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Open but Not Free — Publishing in the 21st CenturyThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2013
- Open AccessPublished by MIT Press ,2012
- Europe joins UK open-access bidNature, 2012