Bias Formulas for Sensitivity Analysis for Direct and Indirect Effects
- 1 July 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) in Epidemiology
- Vol. 21 (4), 540-551
- https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0b013e3181df191c
Abstract
A key question in many studies is how to divide the total effect of an exposure into a component that acts directly on the outcome and a component that acts indirectly, ie, through some intermediate. For example, one might be interested in the extent to which the effect of diet on blood pressure is mediated through sodium intake and the extent to which it operates through other pathways. In the context of such mediation analysis, even if the effect of the exposure on the outcome is unconfounded, estimates of direct and indirect effects will be biased if control is not made for confounders of the mediator-outcome relationship. Often data are not collected on such mediator-outcome confounding variables; the results in this paper allow researchers to assess the sensitivity of their estimates of direct and indirect effects to the biases from such confounding. Specifically, the paper provides formulas for the bias in estimates of direct and indirect effects due to confounding of the exposure-mediator relationship and of the mediator-outcome relationship. Under some simplifying assumptions, the formulas are particularly easy to use in sensitivity analysis. The bias formulas are illustrated by examples in the literature concerning direct and indirect effects in which mediator-outcome confounding may be present.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alternative Assumptions for the Identification of Direct and Indirect EffectsEpidemiology, 2011
- Bias Formulas for Sensitivity Analysis of Unmeasured Confounding for General Outcomes, Treatments, and ConfoundersEpidemiology, 2011
- A general approach to causal mediation analysis.Psychological Methods, 2010
- Concerning the Consistency Assumption in Causal InferenceEpidemiology, 2009
- Quantification of collider‐stratification bias and the birthweight paradoxPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 2009
- Mediation and mechanismEuropean Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- Mediation analysis with principal stratificationStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Direct Effect ModelsThe International Journal of Biostatistics, 2008
- Are Brain Volumes based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mediators of the Associations of Cumulative Lead Dose with Cognitive Function?American Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- A new approach to causal inference in mortality studies with a sustained exposure period—application to control of the healthy worker survivor effectMathematical Modelling, 1986