A Comparison of Free-Stall Barns Used by Modernized Wisconsin Dairies
Open Access
- 1 February 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Dairy Science Association in Journal of Dairy Science
- Vol. 84 (2), 528-541
- https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(01)74504-3
Abstract
A primary objective of the Wisconsin Dairy Modernization Survey was to compare features of free-stall barns available to dairy producers. This study used data from a large random sample of expanding dairy farms to determine whether the theoretical benefits of particular free-stall configurations bear out under on-farm conditions. Comparisons were made among herds using free-stall barns as their primary housing for new versus remodeled facilities, barn design, bedding used, feed-delivery design, manure removal strategies, animal restraint, maternity areas, overcrowding, and cooling methods. Producers who made the transition from tie-stall housing to free-stall housing were satisfied with this decision. New free-stall barns provided a more desirable environment for the herds than remodeled free-stall barns, although initial investments were higher. When new free-stall barns were compared, herds with four-row barns had higher production, lower somatic cell count, and higher stocking rates than herds with six-row barns. Respondents were more satisfied with four- and six-row barns than with two- and three-row barns. Respondents felt sand provided some advantages for cow comfort, while satisfaction with bedding cost and manure handling was higher with mattresses. Dairy Herd Improvement data showed no difference in milk production or somatic cell count for producers who chose sand or mattress-based free stalls. Respondents were more satisfied with the use of drive-through feeding than other feed-delivery designs. Most producers chose to use tractor scrapers to remove manure; however, producers who used automated systems were more satisfied with manure management. Few differences were observed when comparing self-locking head gates to palpation rails. Overcrowding did not have any adverse affect on production or user satisfaction with feed intake or cow comfort. Using supplemental cooling appeared to facilitate higher production.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Characteristics of Minnesota Dairy Farms that Significantly Increased Milk Production from 1989-1993Journal of Dairy Science, 1999
- The Effects of Restraint Using Self-Locking Stanchions on Dairy Cows in Relation to Behavior, Feed Intake, Physiological Parameters, Health, and Milk YieldJournal of Dairy Science, 1997
- The Influence of Feeding and Housing Systems on Production, Reproduction, and Somatic Cell Count Scores of Southern Holstein Herds11Contribution to NC-119 regional research project “Dairy Herd Management Strategies for Improved Decision Making and Profitability.”The Professional Animal Scientist, 1997
- Effect of overcrowding on claw health in first-calved friesian heifersBritish Veterinary Journal, 1996
- Estimating the effectiveness of extension information systems using farm trials and subjective probabilitiesAgricultural Economics, 1992
- Bacterial Counts in Bedding Materials Used on Nine Commercial DairiesJournal of Dairy Science, 1988
- Survey of Calf and Heifer Housing on Pennsylvania Dairy FarmsJournal of Dairy Science, 1987
- Change of Milk Production with Housing System and Herd ExpansionJournal of Dairy Science, 1981
- Changes in Production, Cash Flow, and Income with Dairy Herd ExpansionJournal of Dairy Science, 1978
- Free Stall and Feed Bunk Requirements Relative to Behavior, Production and Individual Feed Intake in Dairy CowsJournal of Dairy Science, 1977