Reducing Management’s Influence on Auditors’ Judgments: An Experimental Investigation of SOX 404 Assessments
- 1 November 2008
- journal article
- Published by American Accounting Association in The Accounting Review
- Vol. 83 (6), 1461-1485
- https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.6.1461
Abstract
Auditors often receive summary information or conclusions from management about account balances or internal controls. They must then gather evidence to assess whether this information is fairly stated. In such situations, management can be considered the “first mover” and the auditor the “second mover.” When auditors are the second mover, they are vulnerable to the curse of knowledge bias—the inability to ignore previously processed information (Fischhoff 1977). Specifically, because information from management could be incorrect or biased, auditors must arrive at an independent evaluation of the item in question (e.g., year-end book values, accounting estimates, or internal controls). This study examines the general issue of auditors being “second movers” by investigating how their awareness of management’s severity classifications of internal control problems influences auditors’ initial assessments of internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) under Auditing Standard No. 2. Our experimental design allows us to determine that management’s “first mover” influence on auditors’ judgments is an unintentional cognitive effect, rather than an intentional use of management’s classifications. We further examine whether cognitively restructuring the ICFR assessment task reduces management’s influence on auditors’ judgments by asking auditors to evaluate and explicitly document the likelihood and magnitude of the effect of an ICFR problem on the financial statements. We find that cognitively restructuring the task mitigates management’s “first mover” influence on auditors’ judgments.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated auditsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 2007
- Independence Threats, Litigation Risk, and the Auditor's Decision Process*Contemporary Accounting Research, 2005
- The Differential Use of Information by Experienced and Novice Auditors in the Performance of Ill‐Structured Audit Tasks*Contemporary Accounting Research, 2002
- Eliminating recency with self‐review: the case of auditors' ‘going concern’ judgmentsJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2002
- The persuasiveness of audit evidence: The case of accounting policy decisionsAccounting, Organizations and Society, 1997
- Learning from Worked‐Out Examples: A Study on Individual DifferencesCognitive Science, 1997
- Expectation-Formation Guidance in the Auditor's Review of Interim Financial InformationJournal of Accounting Research, 1995
- The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological Bulletin, 1990
- The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental AnalysisJournal of Political Economy, 1989
- The Auditor As an Economic AgentJournal of Accounting Research, 1982