A study on comparative outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone, supine, and flank positions
- 13 June 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in World Journal of Urology
- Vol. 31 (5), 1225-1230
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0889-y
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Debate Over Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Positioning: A Comprehensive ReviewJournal of Urology, 2011
- SUPINE VS PRONE PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY: AN ANAESTHETIST'S VIEWBJU International, 2011
- Complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL) in patients with and without a history of stone surgery: safety and effectiveness of csPCNLUrological Research, 2010
- Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney calculi: a meta-analysisInternational Urology and Nephrology, 2010
- Position: Prone or Supine Is the Issue of Percutaneous NephrolithotomyJournal of Endourology, 2010
- Totally Ultrasonography-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Flank PositionJournal of Endourology, 2008
- Anaesthesia in the prone positionBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2008
- TECHNIQUE AND COMPLICATIONS OF PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSCOPY: EXPERIENCE WITH 557 PATIENTS IN THE SUPINE POSITIONJournal of Urology, 1998
- Percutaneous PyelolithotomyScandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, 1976
- PERCUTANEOUS TROCAR (NEEDLE) NEPHROSTOMY IN HYDRONEPHROSISJournal of the American Medical Association, 1955