Fiscal consolidation under electoral risk
- 19 September 2016
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Political Research
- Vol. 56 (1), 151-168
- https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12171
Abstract
The European debt crisis has uncovered serious tension between democratic politics and market pressure in contemporary democracies. This tension arises when governments implement unpopular fiscal consolidation packages in order to raise their macroeconomic credibility among financial investors. Nonetheless, the dominant view in current research is that governments should not find it difficult to balance demands from voters and investors because the economic and political costs of fiscal consolidations are low. This would leave governments with sufficient room to promote fiscal consolidation according to their ideological agenda. This article re-examines this proposition by studying how the risk of governments to be replaced in office affects the probability and timing of fiscal consolidation policies. The results show that governments associate significant electoral risk with consolidations because electorally vulnerable governments strategically avoid consolidations towards the end of the legislative term in order to minimise electoral punishment. Specifically, the predicted probability of consolidation decreases from 40 per cent after an election to 13 per cent towards the end of the term when the government's margin of victory is small. When the electoral margin is large, the probability of consolidation is roughly stable at around 35 per cent. Electoral concerns are the most important political determinant of consolidations, leaving only a minor role for ideological concerns. Governments, hence, find it more difficult to reconcile political and economic pressures on fiscal policy than previous, influential research implies. The results suggest that existing studies under-estimate the electoral risk associated with consolidations because they ignore the strategic behaviour that is established in this analysis.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity?European Journal of Political Research, 2010
- Democratic Accountability in Open EconomiesQuarterly Journal of Political Science, 2010
- Back to the Future: Modeling Time Dependence in Binary DataPolitical Analysis, 2010
- Democratic Compromise: A Latent Variable Analysis of Ten Measures of Regime TypePolitical Analysis, 2010
- Conditional Punishment: A Comparative Analysis of the Electoral Consequences of Welfare State Retrenchment in OECD Nations, 1980–2003West European Politics, 2008
- The Challenge to Party GovernmentWest European Politics, 2008
- Political Accountability and the Room to ManeuverComparative Political Studies, 2007
- Trade and the Timing of ElectionsBritish Journal of Political Science, 2006
- Opening the Window for ReformComparative Political Studies, 1993
- Institutions, Veto Points, and Policy Results: A Comparative Analysis of Health CareJournal of Public Policy, 1990