Graduate quantum mechanics reform
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) in American Journal of Physics
- Vol. 77 (4), 308-319
- https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3079689
Abstract
We address four main areas in which graduate quantum mechanics education can be improved: course content, textbook, teaching methods, and assessment tools. We report on a three year longitudinal study at the Colorado School of Mines using innovations in all these areas. In particular, we have modified the content of the course to reflect progress in the field of quantum mechanics over the last 50years, used textbooks that include such content, incorporated a variety of teaching techniques based on physics education research, and used a variety of assessment tools to study the effectiveness of these reforms. We present a new assessment tool, the Graduate Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey, and further testing of a previously developed assessment tool, the Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey. We find that graduate students respond well to research-based techniques that have been tested mainly in introductory courses, and that they learn much of the new content introduced in each version of the course. We also find that students’ ability to answer conceptual questions about graduate quantum mechanics is highly correlated with their ability to solve calculational problems on the same topics. In contrast, we find that students’ understanding of basic undergraduate quantum mechanics concepts at the modern physics level is not improved by instruction at the graduate level.We address four main areas in which graduate quantum mechanics education can be improved: course content, textbook, teaching methods, and assessment tools. We report on a three year longitudinal study at the Colorado School of Mines using innovations in all these areas. In particular, we have modified the content of the course to reflect progress in the field of quantum mechanics over the last 50years, used textbooks that include such content, incorporated a variety of teaching techniques based on physics education research, and used a variety of assessment tools to study the effectiveness of these reforms. We present a new assessment tool, the Graduate Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey, and further testing of a previously developed assessment tool, the Quantum Mechanics Conceptual Survey. We find that graduate students respond well to research-based techniques that have been tested mainly in introductory courses, and that they learn much of the new content introduced in each version of the course. We a...Keywords
Other Versions
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Student understanding of quantum mechanics at the beginning of graduate instructionAmerican Journal of Physics, 2008
- Comparing Students’ and Experts’ Understanding of the Content of a LectureJournal of Science Education and Technology, 2007
- Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics coursesAmerican Journal of Physics, 1998
- Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time- Varying AnalyzersPhysical Review Letters, 1982
- Experimental Tests of Realistic Local Theories via Bell's TheoremPhysical Review Letters, 1981
- On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradoxPhysics Physique Fizika, 1964
- Theory of SuperconductivityPhysical Review B, 1957
- "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum MechanicsReviews of Modern Physics, 1957
- Assessment of Everett's "Relative State" Formulation of Quantum TheoryReviews of Modern Physics, 1957
- An Undulatory Theory of the Mechanics of Atoms and MoleculesPhysical Review B, 1926