Is Zero the Ideal Death Rate?
- 12 July 2007
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 357 (2), 111-113
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp078025
Abstract
Massachusetts recently joined New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania in reporting death rates associated with cardiac surgery for individual surgeons — another wave in the tide of public reporting that is sweeping the country. Such reporting raises questions about distinguishing the goals that define one's work from the targets used to measure success. For hospitals and physicians, minimizing death and complications is an undisputed goal. But is zero the ideal target for measures of performance with respect to death and complications?In this era of public accountability, the answers to questions such as this turn out to be surprisingly complex. . . .Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Intervention to Decrease Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the ICUNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- Public versus private institutional performance reporting: What is mandatory for quality improvement?American Heart Journal, 2006
- Early Revascularization and Long-term Survival in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 2006