Risk factors for failure to thrive in infancy depend on the anthropometric definitions used: The Copenhagen County Child Cohort
- 13 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
- Vol. 21 (5), 418-431
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00851.x
Abstract
Failure to thrive (FTT) is the term widely used to describe poor weight gain in infancy, a condition associated with cognitive deficiency in later childhood. FTT has been investigated in earlier population studies, but little is known about risk factors for FTT or the sequence of events as this requires data to be collected prospectively within the first year of life. Furthermore, several different anthropometric criteria have been used to define FTT, and it is not known whether children identified by the different criteria are comparable. In the present population study we compared risk factors for FTT in a general infant population using different definitions of FTT. Three different criteria of FTT mirroring those used in previous population studies were applied to a birth cohort of 6090 infants. Sociodemographic data and prospectively collected information concerning physical and mental development of the children were obtained from National registries and standardised public health nurse records. Risk factors preceding each of the three 'types' of FTT were compared. The three criteria for FTT identified children with very different profiles and a prevalence of FTT ranging from around 2% to 21% in this affluent population. The criterion of slow weight gain conditional on birthweight (conditional weight gain) was associated with lower birthweight, small-for-gestational-age and deviant overall development. Adding low body mass index did not change this profile. In contrast, the commonly used criterion of downward crossing of centiles on an ordinary weight-for-age chart was associated with factors normally linked with low risk of adverse physical and mental development. Slow conditional weight gain, irrespective of additional thinness, seemed to identify infants with prenatal growth retardation and early developmental delays. In contrast, simple downward crossing of centiles seemed mainly to identify healthy low-risk infants, and thus, seems a poor screening measure of FTT in this affluent infant population. Thus, conditional weight gain appears to be the most sensible measure of FTT at present. However, only longitudinal studies including different anthropometric measures and different outcomes can unravel the discriminating power of the different FTT definitions concerning long-term prognosis.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Failure to thrive: the prevalence and concurrence of anthropometric criteria in a general infant populationArchives of Disease in Childhood, 2006
- The Copenhagen County child cohort: Design of a longitudinal study of child mental healthScandinavian Journal of Public Health, 2005
- The growth pattern of 0–1-year-old Danish children, when screened by public health nurses—The Copenhagen County Child Cohort 2000Annals of Human Biology, 2005
- Mealtime energy intake and feeding behaviour in children who fail to thrive: a population‐based case‐control studyJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2004
- Family, socioeconomic and prenatal factors associated with failure to thrive in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)International Journal of Epidemiology, 2004
- A community based study of failure to thrive in Israel.Archives of Disease in Childhood, 1996
- Does poor weight gain identify children in need?Child Abuse Review, 1994
- Postnatal Growth and Mental Development: Evidence for a “Sensitive Period”Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1994
- Failure to ThriveClinical Pediatrics, 1989
- Prospective study of antecedents for nonorganic failure to thriveThe Journal of Pediatrics, 1985