Towards the improved treatment of generalization of knowledge claims in IS research: drawing general conclusions from samples
- 1 January 2012
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis Ltd in European Journal of Information Systems
- Vol. 21 (1), 6-21
- https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.9
Abstract
The European Journal of Information Systems provides a distinctive European perspective on the theory and practice of information systems for a global audience. We encourage first rate research articles by academics, but also case studies and reflective articles by practitioners. We provide a critical view on technology, development, implementation, strategy, management and policy.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- IntroductionOrganizational Research Methods, 2007
- Why We Don't Really Know What Statistical Significance Means: Implications for EducatorsJournal of Marketing Education, 2006
- Confusion Over Measures of Evidence (p's) Versus Errors (α's) in Classical Statistical TestingThe American Statistician, 2003
- On the Probability of Observing Misleading Statistical EvidenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 2000
- Significance Tests Die HardTheory & Psychology, 1995
- The earth is round (p < .05).American Psychologist, 1994
- The Fisher, Neyman-Pearson Theories of Testing Hypotheses: One Theory or Two?Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1993
- What do data really mean? Research findings, meta-analysis, and cumulative knowledge in psychology.American Psychologist, 1992
- The Effect of Sample Size on the Meaning of Significance TestsThe American Statistician, 1986
- Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1978