Treatment outcomes for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis under DOTS-Plus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies
Open Access
- 17 January 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Infectious Diseases of Poverty
- Vol. 6 (1), 1-8
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-016-0214-x
Abstract
Anti-tuberculosis drug resistance is a major public health problem that threatens the progress made in tuberculosis care and control worldwide. Treatment success rates of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a key issue that cannot be ignored. There is a paucity of evidence that assessed studies on the treatment of MDR-TB, which focus on the effectiveness of the directly observed treatment, short-course (DOTS)-Plus program. Therefore, it is crucial to assess and summarize the overall treatment outcomes for MDR-TB patients enrolled in the DOTS-Plus program in recent years. The purpose of this study was to thus assess and summarize the available evidence for MDR-TB treatment outcomes under DOTS-Plus. A systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature was conducted. Original studies were identified using the databases MEDLINE®/PubMed®, Hinari, and Google Scholar. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the Cochran’s Q test and I2 statistic. Pooled estimates of treatment outcomes were computed using the random effect model. Based on the 14 observational studies included in the meta-analysis, it was determined that 5 047 patients reported treatment outcomes. Of these, the pooled prevalence, 63.5% (95% CI: 58.4–68.5%) successfully completed full treatment (cured or treatment completed) with a pooled cure rate of 55.6%, whereas 12.6% (95% CI: 9.0–16.2%) of the patients died, 14.2% (95% CI: 11.6–16.8%) defaulted from therapy, and 7.6% (95% CI: 5.6–9.7%) failed therapy. Overall 35.4% (95% CI: 30–40.8%) of patients had unsuccessful treatment outcomes. An unsatisfactorily high percentage 43% (95% CI: 32–54%) of unsuccessful treatment outcomes was observed among patients who were enrolled in standardized treatment regimens. This study revealed that patients with MDR-TB exhibited a very low treatment success rate compared to the World Health Organization 2015 target of at least 75 to 90%. The high default rate observed by conducting this literature review could possibly explain the spread of the MDR-TB strain in various populations. A better treatment success rate was observed among patients in individualized treatment regimens than in standardized ones. Conducting further individual-based meta-analysis is recommended to identify potential factors for defaulting treatment using large-scale and multi-center studies.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcomes of Multi-Drug Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) among a Cohort of South African Patients with High HIV PrevalencePLOS ONE, 2011
- Treatment Outcomes of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisPLOS ONE, 2009
- Treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysisThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2009
- Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes in Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan: Treatment Complexity and XDR-TB among Treatment FailuresPLOS ONE, 2007
- Feasibility and Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Cohort Study in the PhilippinesPLoS Medicine, 2006
- Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis Management in Resource-limited SettingsEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Clinical outcome of individualised treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Latvia: a retrospective cohort studyThe Lancet, 2005
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- The case for knowledge translation: shortening the journey from evidence to effectBMJ, 2003
- Community-Based Therapy for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Lima, PeruThe New England Journal of Medicine, 2003