Stoffenmanager Exposure Model: Development of a Quantitative Algorithm
Open Access
- 10 July 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Annals of Work Exposures and Health
- Vol. 52 (6), 443-454
- https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/men033
Abstract
In The Netherlands, the web-based tool called ‘Stoffenmanager’ was initially developed to assist small- and medium-sized enterprises to prioritize and control risks of handling chemical products in their workplaces. The aim of the present study was to explore the accuracy of the Stoffenmanager exposure algorithm. This was done by comparing its semi-quantitative exposure rankings for specific substances with exposure measurements collected from several occupational settings to derive a quantitative exposure algorithm. Exposure data were collected using two strategies. First, we conducted seven surveys specifically for validation of the Stoffenmanager. Second, existing occupational exposure data sets were collected from various sources. This resulted in 378 and 320 measurements for solid and liquid scenarios, respectively. The Spearman correlation coefficients between Stoffenmanager scores and exposure measurements appeared to be good for handling solids (rs = 0.80, N = 378, P < 0.0001) and liquid scenarios (rs = 0.83, N = 320, P < 0.0001). However, the correlation for liquid scenarios appeared to be lower when calculated separately for sets of volatile substances with a vapour pressure >10 Pa (rs = 0.56, N = 104, P < 0.0001) and non-volatile substances with a vapour pressure ≤10 Pa (rs = 0.53, N = 216, P < 0.0001). The mixed-effect regression models with natural log-transformed Stoffenmanager scores as independent parameter explained a substantial part of the total exposure variability (52% for solid scenarios and 76% for liquid scenarios). Notwithstanding the good correlation, the data show substantial variability in exposure measurements given a certain Stoffenmanager score. The overall performance increases our confidence in the use of the Stoffenmanager as a generic tool for risk assessment. The mixed-effect regression models presented in this paper may be used for assessment of so-called reasonable worst case exposures. This evaluation is considered as an ongoing process and when more good quality data become available, the analyses described in this paper will be expanded. Based on these analyses, the algorithm will be refined in the near future.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the Utility and Reliability of COSHH EssentialsAnnals of Occupational Hygiene, 2006
- Margins of Safety Provided by COSHH Essentials and the ILO Chemical Control ToolkitAnnals of Occupational Hygiene, 2005
- Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence Program for Estimating Occupational ExposuresAnnals of Occupational Hygiene, 2004
- Reliability of a semi-quantitative method for dermal exposure assessment (DREAM)Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2004
- Studying the Determinants of Exposure: A Review of MethodsAihaj Journal, 1999
- European Proposal for Core Information for the Storage and Exchange of Workplace Exposure Measurements on Chemical AgentsApplied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 1997
- Evaluation of the Mass Balance Model Used by the Environmental Protection Agency for Estimating Inhalation Exposure to New Chemical SubstancesAihaj Journal, 1996
- Performance-Based Exposure Control Limits for Pharmaceutical Active IngredientsAihaj Journal, 1996
- ENVIRONMENTAL VERSUS ANALYTICAL VARIABILITY IN EXPOSURE MEASUREMENTSAihaj Journal, 1991
- Subjective Estimation of Toluene Exposures: A Calibration Study of Industrial HygienistsApplied Industrial Hygiene, 1989