Practical Implications of Differential Discounting in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses with Varying Numbers of Cohorts
- 20 May 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Value in Health
- Vol. 14 (4), 438-442
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2010.09.009
Abstract
Objective To call attention to the influence of the number of birth-cohorts used in cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) models on incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) under differential discounting. Methods The consequences of increasing the number of birth-cohorts are demonstrated using a CEA of cervical cancer prevention as an example. The cost-effectiveness of vaccinating 12-year-old girls against the human papillomavirus is estimated with the MISCAN microsimulation screening analysis model for 1, 10, 20, and 30 birth-cohorts. Costs and health effects are discounted with equal rates of 4% and alternatively with differential rates of 4% and 1.5% respectively. The effects of increasing the number of cohorts are shown by comparing the ICERs under equal and differential discounting. Results The ICER decreases as the number of cohorts increases under differential discounting, but not under equal discounting. Conclusions The variation of ICERs with the number of cohorts under differential discounting prompts questions regarding the appropriate specification of CEA models and interpretation of their results. In particular, it raises concerns that arbitrary variation in study specification leads to arbitrary variation in results. Such variations could lead to erroneous policy decisions. These findings are relevant to CEA guidance authorities, CEA practitioners, and decision makers. Our results do not imply a problem with differential discounting per se, yet they highlight the need for practical guidance for its use.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Cancer Institute
- Health Research Board
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social Time Preferences for Health and Money Elicited with a Choice ExperimentValue in Health, 2010
- Discounting in economic evaluations: stepping forward towards optimal decision rulesHealth Economics, 2006
- Discounting and cost‐effectiveness in NICE – stepping back to sort out a confusionHealth Economics, 2005
- Need for differential discounting of costs and health effects in cost effectiveness analysesBMJ, 2005
- Towards a healthier discount procedureExpert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 2005
- Discounting for health effects in cost–benefit and cost‐effectiveness analysisHealth Economics, 2001
- THE PRACTICE OF DISCOUNTING IN ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS OF HEALTHCARE INTERVENTIONSInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2001
- Discounting costs and effects: a reconsiderationHealth Economics, 1998
- Discounting of Life-Saving and Other Nonmonetary EffectsManagement Science, 1983
- Foundations of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health and Medical PracticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977