Composite versus single transportable carbohydrate solution enhances race and laboratory cycling performance
- 1 June 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Canadian Science Publishing in Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
- Vol. 37 (3), 425-436
- https://doi.org/10.1139/h2012-013
Abstract
When ingested at high rates (1.8–2.4 g·min–1) in concentrated solutions, carbohydrates absorbed by multiple (e.g., fructose and glucose) vs. single intestinal transporters can increase exogenous carbohydrate oxidation and endurance performance, but their effect when ingested at lower, more realistic, rates during intermittent high-intensity endurance competition and trials is unknown. Trained cyclists participated in two independent randomized crossover investigations comprising mountain-bike races (average 141 min; n = 10) and laboratory trials (94-min high-intensity intervals followed by 10 maximal sprints; n = 16). Solutions ingested during exercise contained electrolytes and fructose + maltodextrin or glucose + maltodextrin in 1:2 ratio ingested, on average, at 1.2 g carbohydrate·kg–1·h–1. Exertion, muscle fatigue, and gastrointestinal discomfort were recorded. Data were analysed using mixed models with gastrointestinal discomfort as a mechanism covariate; inferences were made against substantiveness thresholds (1.2% for performance) and standardized difference. The fructose–maltodextrin solution substantially reduced race time (–1.8%; 90% confidence interval = ±1.8%) and abdominal cramps (–8.1 on a 0–100 scale; ±6.6). After accounting for gastrointestinal discomfort, the effect of the fructose–maltodextrin solution on lap time was reduced (–1.1%; ±2.4%), suggesting that gastrointestinal discomfort explained part of the effect of fructose–maltodextrin on performance. In the laboratory, mean sprint power was enhanced (1.4%; ±0.8%) with fructose–maltodextrin, but the effect on peak power was unclear (0.7%; ±1.5%). Adjusting out gastrointestinal discomfort augmented the fructose–maltodextrin effect on mean (2.6%; ±1.9%) and peak (2.5%; ±3.0%) power. Ingestion of multiple transportable vs. single transportable carbohydrates enhanced mountain-bike race and high-intensity laboratory cycling performance, with inconsistent but not irreconcilable effects of gut discomfort as a possible mediating mechanism.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impact of physical exercise on the gastrointestinal tractCurrent Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 2009
- Carbohydrate sensing in the human mouth: effects on exercise performance and brain activityJournal Of Physiology-London, 2009
- Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise ScienceMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2009
- Plasma deuterium oxide accumulation following ingestion of different carbohydrate beveragesApplied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 2008
- Superior Endurance Performance with Ingestion of Multiple Transportable CarbohydratesMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2008
- A comparison between three rating scales for perceived exertion and two different work testsScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2005
- Functional foods and food supplements for athletes: from myths to benefit claims substantiation through the study of selected biomarkersBritish Journal of Nutrition, 2002
- Urinary Indices of Hydration StatusInternational Journal of Sport Nutrition, 1994
- Rationale for Upper Limits of Electrolyte Replacement during ExerciseInternational Journal of Sport Nutrition, 1992
- Effects of ingesting 6% and 12% glucose/electrolyte beverages during prolonged intermittent cycling in the heatEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 1988