Addressing the spatial disconnect between national-scale total maximum daily loads and localized land management decisions
Open Access
- 1 May 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Environmental Quality
- Vol. 49 (3), 613-627
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20051
Abstract
Regulatory watershed mitigation programs typically emphasize widespread adoption of best management practices (BMPs) to meet total maximum daily load (TMDL) goals. To comply with the Chesapeake Bay TMDL, jurisdictions must develop watershed implementation plans (WIPs) to determine the number and type of BMPs to implement. However, the spatial resolution of the bay-level model used to determine these load reduction goals is so coarse that the regulatory plan cannot consider heterogeneity in local conditions, which affects BMP effectiveness. Using the Topo-SWAT modification of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), we simulated two BMP adoption scenarios in the Spring Creek watershed in central Pennsylvania to determine if leveraging fine-scale spatial heterogeneity to place BMPs could achieve the same (or better) nutrient and sediment reduction at a lower cost than the state-level WIP BMP adoption recommendations. Topo-SWAT was initialized with detailed land use and management practice information, systematically calibrated, and validated against 12 yr of observed data. After determining individual BMP cost effectiveness, results were ranked to design a cost-effective BMP adoption scenario that achieved equal or greater load reduction as the WIP scenario for 74% of the cost using eight management-based BMPs: no-till, manure injection, cover cropping, riparian buffers, land retirement, manure application timing, wetland restoration, and nitrogen management (15% less N input). Because watersheds of this size typically represent the smallest modeling unit in the Chesapeake Bay Model, results demonstrate the potential to use watershed models with finer inference scales to improve recommendations for BMP implementation under the Chesapeake Bay TMDL.Funding Information
- US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the Center for Nutrient Solutions, Penn State University, USA (RD 83556801-0)
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- Development and application of a physically based landscape water balance in the SWAT modelHydrological Processes, 2010
- Least‐cost control of agricultural nutrient contributions to the Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zoneEcological Applications, 2010
- Combined Monitoring and Modeling Indicate the Most Effective Agricultural Best Management PracticesJournal of Environmental Quality, 2008
- Assessing manure management strategies through small-plot research and wholefarm modelingJournal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008
- Re-conceptualizing the soil and water assessment tool (SWAT) model to predict runoff from variable source areasJournal of Hydrology, 2008
- WATERSHED LEVEL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE SELECTION AND PLACEMENT IN THE TOWN BROOK WATERSHED, NEW YORK1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2006
- Stream–air temperature relations to classify stream–ground water interactions in a karst setting, central Pennsylvania, USAJournal of Hydrology, 2006
- Green Subsidies in Agriculture: Estimating the Adoption Costs of Conservation Tillage from Observed BehaviorCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 2006
- Cost-effective Targeting of Riparian BuffersCanadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, 2004
- OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURE FOR COST EFFECTIVE BMP PLACEMENT AT A WATERSHED SCALE1Jawra Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2003