Comparison of LDL Cholesterol Concentrations by Friedewald Calculation and Direct Measurement in Relation to Cardiovascular Events in 27 331 Women
Open Access
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Chemistry
- Vol. 55 (5), 888-894
- https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.117929
Abstract
Background: National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines recommend development of direct assays for LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) measurement, but it is unclear how these assays compare with Friedewald calculation in predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: In a study of 27 331 healthy women with triglycerides ≤4.52 mmol/L (≤400 mg/dL), baseline fasting Friedewald LDL-C was compared with fasting and nonfasting direct homogenous measurement for incident CVD during an 11-year period. Results: Fasting LDL-C measurements obtained by the 2 methods were highly correlated (r = 0.976, P < 0.001). Compared with fasting Friedewald LDL-C, mean fasting direct LDL-C was 0.15 mmol/L (5.6 mg/dL) lower and nonfasting direct LDL-C 0.30 mmol/L (11.5 mg/dL) lower, both P < 0.0001. The adjusted hazard ratio per 1-SD increment was 1.23 [95% CI 1.15–1.32; 1-SD 0.88 mmol/L (34.1 mg/dL)] for fasting direct LDL-C and 1.22 [95% CI 1.14–1.30; 1-SD 0.90 mmol/L (34.9 mg/dL)] for fasting Friedewald. Nonfasting LDL-C was not associated with CVD by either method. Fasting LDL-C measurements fell into the same NCEP risk category with either method for 79.3% of participants, whereas they differed by 1 NCEP category for 20.7% of participants, with most classified into a lower-risk category by direct LDL-C. Conclusions: The association of LDL-C with CVD by the 2 methods was nearly identical in fasting samples. However, the lower direct LDL-C concentrations may misclassify many individuals into a lower NCEP category. Moreover, the lack of association of nonfasting direct LDL-C with CVD raises questions regarding the clinical utility of a direct assay for LDL-C in nonfasting blood samples.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-43851, CA-47988)
- National Cancer Institute
- Donald W. Reynolds Foundation
- Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
- AstraZeneca
- Novartis
- Merck
- American Heart Association (0670007N)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08 HL094375)
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fasting Compared With Nonfasting Lipids and Apolipoproteins for Predicting Incident Cardiovascular EventsCirculation, 2008
- A brief history of lipid and lipoprotein measurements and their contribution to clinical chemistryClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2006
- Vitamin E in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and CancerJAMA, 2005
- Low-Dose Aspirin in the Primary Prevention of CancerJama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2005
- A Randomized Trial of Low-Dose Aspirin in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- How should low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration be determined?2002
- MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebocontrolled trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Performance of Four Homogeneous Direct Methods for LDL-CholesterolClinical Chemistry, 2002
- Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III)Jama-Journal Of The American Medical Association, 2001
- Analytical performance and clinical efficacy of three routine procedures for LDL cholesterol measurement compared with the ultracentrifugation–dextran sulfate–Mg2+ methodClinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry, 2000