Influence of practice tests on the accuracy of predicting memory performance for paired associates, sentences, and text material
- 14 November 2002
- book chapter
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting performance on text: Delayed versus immediate predictions and testsMemory & Cognition, 1998
- Judgments of Learning at Delays: Shifts in Response Patterns or Increased Metamemory Accuracy?Psychological Science, 1997
- Similarity between the Cue for Judgments of Learning (JOL) and the Cue for Test Is Not the Primary Determinant of JOL AccuracyJournal of Memory and Language, 1997
- Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy.Psychology and Aging, 1997
- Does the Sensitivity of Judgments of Learning (JOLs) to the Effects of Various Study Activities Depend on When the JOLs Occur?Journal of Memory and Language, 1994
- Memory in naturalistic and laboratory contexts: Distinguishing the accuracy-oriented and quantity-oriented approaches to memory assessment.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1994
- How Shall We Explain the Delayed-Judgment-Of-Learning Effect?Psychological Science, 1992
- Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effectMemory & Cognition, 1992
- Judgments of Knowing: The Influence of Retrieval PracticeThe American Journal of Psychology, 1980
- Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1965