Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for class II malocclusions
- 1 May 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
- Vol. 123 (5), 489-496
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00045-3
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT: WHAT ARE THE IMPERATIVES?The Journal of the American Dental Association, 2000
- Orthodontists' Perceptions of the Impact of Phase 1 Treatment for Class II Malocclusion on Phase 2 NeedsJournal of Dental Research, 1999
- Benefit of early Class II treatment: Progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trialAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1998
- Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion: A randomized clinical trialAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1998
- Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgearAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1998
- Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR IndexEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1997
- The effectiveness of Class II, Division 1 treatmentAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1995
- The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficultyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1995
- The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standardsEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1992
- The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validityEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 1992