Comparing the Auditor Quality of Arthur Andersen to that of the Big 4
- 1 January 2006
- journal article
- Published by American Accounting Association in Accounting and the Public Interest
- Vol. 6 (1), 135-161
- https://doi.org/10.2308/api.2006.6.1.135
Abstract
This study compares the audit quality of Arthur Andersen with that of the Big 4 accounting firms. An expanded indicator of audit quality is developed based on the law of business misconduct literature and the legal process literature. A representation of audit quality is derived from an analysis of the legal actions initiated against these five large public accounting firms from 1996 to 2004. The legal action was partitioned into three year periods. In the first period, Arthur Andersen and the Big 4 evidenced no quality differential. In the second and third periods, the Big 4, in aggregate, rated higher on the audit quality indicator than did Andersen. The robustness of these findings is substantiated using multiple logistic regression and sensitivity analysis. When the individual firms are compared with Andersen, all four evidenced higher audit quality; three of the firms are significantly higher. This suggests that Andersen represents an outlier within the audit population. However, the analysis also indicates that overall audit quality declined in the period immediately following the passage of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This suggests that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act provisions directed toward remedying auditing deficiencies is justified and not an overreaction to a “few bad apples.”Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Auditor Reputation, Auditor Independence, and the Stock‐Market Impact of Andersen's Indictment on Its Client Firms*Contemporary Accounting Research, 2006
- Was Arthur Andersen Different? An Empirical Examination of Major Accounting Firm Audits of Large ClientsJournal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2004
- Auditor Independence, Non‐Audit Services, and Restatements: Was the U.S. Government Right?*Journal of Accounting Research, 2004
- Attorney Fees in Class Action Settlements: An Empirical StudyJournal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2003
- Audit Firm Reputation and Client Stock Price Reactions: Evidence from the Enron ExperienceSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1998
- Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Econometrics.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1988
- Suit, Settlement, and Trial: A Theoretical Analysis under Alternative Methods for the Allocation of Legal CostsThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1982
- White-Collar CriminalityAmerican Sociological Review, 1940
- The Nature of the FirmEconomica, 1937