Delayed hysterectomy versus continuing conservative management for placenta percreta: which is better?
- 2 April 2020
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Elsevier BV in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Vol. 223 (2), 304
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.025
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Gynecologic Cancer Research
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Delayed hysterectomy: a laparotomy too far?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020
- Outcomes following a clinical algorithm allowing for delayed hysterectomy in the management of severe placenta accreta spectrumAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020
- Treatment and outcome of placenta percreta: Primary cesarean hysterectomy versus conservative managementEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2019
- Conservative management of placenta percretaInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2017
- Arteriovenous malformation identification after conservative management of placenta percreta with uterine artery embolization and adjunctive therapyAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2011