The Illusion of Legitimacy: Two Assumptions that Corrupt Health Policy Deliberation
- 1 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Medicine and Philosophy
- Vol. 33 (5), 445-460
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhn026
Abstract
Public deliberation about health policy in the United States often hinges on two untenable basic assumptions about political legitimacy. The first assumption, common in public debate throughout the United States, is that federal oversight of health care is justified under a federal compact binding all citizens. This assumption is false because the federal compact precludes such oversight. Indeed, the ascendancy of national government (and demise of federalism) over the past 70 years was engineered through the subversion of the federal compact, creating an expansive legitimation gap. The second assumption—that political legitimacy can be established through appeals to expert consensus about fundamental conceptions of justice or human rights—is prevalent among bioethicists. I argue that this assumption is illicit because it hinges on a weak, rationalistic form of majoritarian democracy that conflates public acquiescence with public approval. If the public mission of academic bioethics involves protecting the integrity of public deliberation, then these two basic assumptions should be challenged.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Social Justice and Core Competencies for Public HealthCanadian Journal of Public Health, 2008
- A Code of Ethics for Public HealthAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2002
- Bioethics and Healthcare Reform: A Whig Response to Weak ConsensusCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2002
- Consensus Formation: The Creation of an IdeologyCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2002
- Making sense of consensus: responses to Engelhardt, Hester, Kuczewski, Trotter, and Zoloth.Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2002
- Moral Consensus in Bioethics: Illusive or Just Elusive?Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 2002
- The Case for a New Fiscal ConstitutionJournal of Economic Perspectives, 1992