Using triangulation to validate themes in qualitative studies
Top Cited Papers
- 21 August 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald in Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal
- Vol. 4 (2), 123-150
- https://doi.org/10.1108/17465640910978391
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to provide instructional guidance on how to increase validity and reduce subjectivity in qualitative studies, such as grounded theory. The paper also demonstrates how different techniques can help management research by including informants/managers in a time efficient way.Design/methodology/approach: This paper describes how three complementary triangulation methods can be used for validation and exploration of concepts and themes in qualitative studies. Tree graphs, concept mapping, and member checking are applied in a managerial case study, complementing a conventional grounded theory approach.Findings: The paper suggests that naturalistic inquiries, such as grounded theory and thematic analysis, can use mixed methods and multiple sources and coders in order to offset biases and to validate and sort findings. The case study presents three different perspectives on how an organization comprehends diversity as a strategic issue.Originality/value: The paper suggests a mixed methods design that addresses some of the potential shortcomings often found in grounded theory and other qualitative studies, their theory development and their documentation of processes. It positions the approach over the range of the triangulation literature and it argues that it is important to be aware of different triangulation mindsets, and these they are not necessarily contradictory.Keywords
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effects of Team Diversity on Team Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Review of Team DemographyJournal of Management, 2007
- Methodological fit in management field researchAcademy of Management Review, 2007
- From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is NotThe Academy of Management Journal, 2006
- What Differences Make a Difference?Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2005
- Extracting, Representing, and Analyzing Mental ModelsSocial Forces, 1992
- Extracting, Representing, and Analyzing Mental ModelsSocial Forces, 1992
- Triangulation of Qualitative Methods: Heideggerian Hermeneutics and Grounded TheoryQualitative Health Research, 1991
- Middle managers and strategy: Microdynamics of inclusionStrategic Management Journal, 1990
- Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteriaQualitative Sociology, 1990
- Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin, 1959