Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Among the Medically Underserved: A Pilot Study within a Federally Qualified Health Center
- 26 July 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 22 (10), 1410-1414
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0295-0
Abstract
Colorectal cancer screening rates remain low, especially among low-income and racial/ethnic minority groups. We pilot-tested a physician-directed strategy aimed at improving rates of recommendation and patient colorectal cancer screening completion at 1 federally qualified health center serving low-income, African-American and Hispanic patients. Colonoscopy was specifically targeted. Single arm, pretest–posttest design. Urban. 154 screening-eligible, yet nonadherent primary care patients receiving care at an urban, federally qualified health center. 1) manually tracking screening-eligible patients, 2) mailing patients a physician letter and brochure before medical visits, 3) health literacy training to help physicians improve their communication with patients to work to resolution, and 4) establishing a “feedback loop” to routinely monitor patient compliance. Chart review of whether patients received a physician recommendation for screening, and completion of any colorectal cancer screening test 12 months after intervention. Physicians recorded patients’ qualitative reasons for noncompliance, and a preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis for screening promotion was also conducted. The baseline screening rate was 11.5%, with 31.6% of patients having received a recommendation from their physician. At 1-year follow-up, rates of screening completion had increased to 27.9 percent (p < .001), and physician recommendation had increased to 92.9% (p < .001). Common reasons for nonadherence included patient readiness (60.7%), competing health problems (11.9%), and fear or anxiety concerning the procedure (8.3%). The total cost for implementing the intervention was $4,676 and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for the intervention was $106 per additional patient screened by colonoscopy. The intervention appears to be a feasible means to improve colorectal cancer screening rates among patients served by community health centers. However, more attention to patient decision making and education may be needed to further increase screening rates.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Colorectal Cancer Screening among the Medically UnderservedJournal Of Health Care For The Poor and Underserved, 2006
- Costs and Cost Effectiveness of a Health Care Provider–Directed Intervention to Promote Colorectal Cancer Screening Among VeteransJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Examining the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening promotionCancer, 2004
- Cost-effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase screening in HMO women overdue for Pap test and mammography servicesPreventive Medicine, 2004
- Patient and provider barriers to colorectal cancer screening in the primary care safety-netPreventive Medicine, 2004
- Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale—Update based on new evidenceGastroenterology, 2003
- Socioeconomic status and stage at presentation of colorectal cancerThe Lancet, 1998
- American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal CancerCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 1997
- Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and MedicineJAMA, 1996
- Implementation Issues and Costs Associated with a Proven Strategy for Increasing Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Low-Income WomenJournal of Public Health Management & Practice, 1996