Addressing the challenges of diagnostics demand and supply: insights from an online global health discussion platform
Open Access
- 2 December 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Global Health
- Vol. 1 (4), e000132
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000132
Abstract
Several barriers challenge development, adoption and scale-up of diagnostics in low and middle income countries. An innovative global health discussion platform allows capturing insights from the global health community on factors driving demand and supply for diagnostics. We conducted a qualitative content analysis of the online discussion ‘Advancing Care Delivery: Driving Demand and Supply of Diagnostics’ organised by the Global Health Delivery Project (GHD) (http://www.ghdonline.org/) at Harvard University. The discussion, driven by 12 expert panellists, explored what must be done to develop delivery systems, business models, new technologies, interoperability standards, and governance mechanisms to ensure that patients receive the right diagnostic at the right time. The GHD Online (GHDonline) platform reaches over 19 000 members from 185 countries. Participants (N=99) in the diagnostics discussion included academics, non-governmental organisations, manufacturers, policymakers, and physicians. Data was coded and overarching categories analysed using qualitative data analysis software. Participants considered technical characteristics of diagnostics as smaller barriers to effective use of diagnostics compared with operational and health system challenges, such as logistics, poor fit with user needs, cost, workforce, infrastructure, access, weak regulation and political commitment. Suggested solutions included: health system strengthening with patient-centred delivery; strengthened innovation processes; improved knowledge base; harmonised guidelines and evaluation; supply chain innovations; and mechanisms for ensuring quality and capacity. Engaging and connecting different actors involved with diagnostic development and use is paramount for improving diagnostics. While the discussion participants were not representative of all actors involved, the platform enabled a discussion between globally acknowledged experts and physicians working in different countries.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnostics for Developing CountriesDiagnostics, 2015
- Enabling the Development and Deployment of Next Generation Point-of-Care DiagnosticsPLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2015
- Knowledge‐sharing intention in professional virtual communities: A comparison between posters and lurkersJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015
- Compounding diagnostic delays: a qualitative study of point‐of‐care testing in South AfricaTropical Medicine & International Health, 2015
- Effects of introducing Xpert MTB/RIF test on multi-drug resistant tuberculosis diagnosis in KwaZulu-Natal South AfricaBMC Infectious Diseases, 2014
- Tuberculosis control needs a complete and patient-centric solutionThe Lancet. Global Health, 2014
- Feasibility, accuracy, and clinical effect of point-of-care Xpert MTB/RIF testing for tuberculosis in primary-care settings in Africa: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trialThe Lancet, 2014
- Point-of-Care Testing for Infectious Diseases: Diversity, Complexity, and Barriers in Low- And Middle-Income CountriesPLoS Medicine, 2012
- Opportunities and Challenges for Cost-Efficient Implementation of New Point-of-Care Diagnostics for HIV and TuberculosisThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2012
- The qualitative content analysis processJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2008