Identifying intensive care unit discharge planning tools: protocol for a scoping review
Open Access
- 5 April 2013
- Vol. 3 (4), e002653
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002653
Abstract
Background Transitions of care between providers are vulnerable periods in healthcare delivery that expose patients to preventable errors and adverse events. Patient discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) to a medical or surgical hospital ward is one of the most challenging and high risk transitions of care. Approximately 1 in 12 patients discharged will be readmitted to ICU or die before leaving the hospital. Many more patients are exposed to unnecessary healthcare, adverse events and/or are disappointed with the quality of their care. Our objective is to conduct a scoping review by systematically searching the literature to identify ICU discharge planning tools and their supporting evidence-base including barriers and facilitators to their use. Methods and analysis Systematic searching of the published health literature will be conducted to identify the existing ICU discharge planning tools and supporting evidence. Literature (research and non-research) reporting on the tools used to facilitate decision making and/or communication at ICU discharge with patients of any age will be included. Outcomes will include adverse events and provider and patient/family-reported outcomes. Two investigators will independently review the abstracts (screen 1) to identify those meeting the inclusion criteria and then independently assess the full text articles (screen 2) to determine if they meet the inclusion criteria. Data collection will include information on citations and identified tools. A quality assessment will be performed on original research studies. A descriptive summary will be developed for each tool. Ethics and dissemination Our scoping review will synthesise the literature for ICU discharge planning tools and identify the opportunities for knowledge to action and gaps in evidence where primary evidence is necessary. This will serve as the foundational element in a multistep research programme to standardise and improve the quality of care provided to patients during ICU discharge. Ethics approval is not required for this study.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to Use an Article About Quality ImprovementJAMA, 2010
- Scoping studies: advancing the methodologyImplementation Science, 2010
- Leaving Critical CareDimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 2007
- Transfers of Patient Care Between House Staff on Internal Medicine WardsArchives of Internal Medicine, 2006
- A nationwide survey of intensive care unit discharge practicesIntensive Care Medicine, 2005
- Balancing Continuity of Care with Residents??? Limited Work Hours: Defining the ImplicationsAcademic Medicine, 2005
- Reducing family members’ anxiety and uncertainty in illness around transfer from intensive care: an intervention studyIntensive and Critical Care Nursing, 2004
- Daily Multidisciplinary Rounds Shorten Length of Stay for Trauma PatientsThe Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2003
- Selecting Common Measures of Quality and System PerformanceMedical Care, 2003
- The Quality in Australian Health Care StudyThe Medical Journal of Australia, 1995