What’s the catch? Profiling the benefits and costs associated with marine protected areas and displaced fishing in the Scotia Sea
Open Access
- 12 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 15 (8), e0237425
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237425
Abstract
Both costs and benefits must be considered when implementing marine protected areas (MPAs), particularly those associated with fishing effort displaced by potential closures. The Southern Ocean offers a case study in understanding such tradeoffs, where MPAs are actively being discussed to achieve a range of protection and sustainable use objectives. Here, we evaluated the possible impacts of two MPA scenarios on the Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) fishery and krill-dependent predators in the Scotia Sea, explicitly addressing the displacement of fishing from closed areas. For both scenarios, we employed a minimally realistic, spatially explicit ecosystem model and considered three alternative redistributions of displaced fishing. We projected both MPAs to provide positive outcomes for many krill-dependent predators, especially when closed areas included at least 50–75% of their foraging distributions. Further, differences between the scenarios suggest ways to improve seal and penguin protection in the Scotia Sea. MPA scenarios also projected increases in total fishery yields, but alongside risks of fishing in areas where relatively low krill densities could cause the fishery to suspend operations. The three alternatives for redistributing displaced fishing had little effect on benefits to predators, but did matter for the fishery, with greater differences in overall catch and risk of fishing in areas of low krill density when displaced fishing was redistributed evenly among the open areas. Collectively, results suggest a well-designed MPA in the Scotia Sea may protect krill-dependent predators, even with displaced fishing, and preclude further spatial management of the krill fishery outside the MPA. More broadly, outcomes denote the importance of delineating fishing and predator habitat, spatial scales, and the critical trade-offs inherent in MPA development.Keywords
Funding Information
- Pew Charitable Trusts (30313)
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Marine protected area improves yield without disadvantaging fishersNature Communications, 2013
- Ecosystem services of the Southern Ocean: trade-offs in decision-makingAntarctic Science, 2013
- Fishers’ Behaviour in Response to the Implementation of a Marine Protected AreaPLOS ONE, 2013
- Larval Export from Marine Reserves and the Recruitment Benefit for Fish and FisheriesCurrent Biology, 2012
- Variability in krill biomass links harvesting and climate warming to penguin population changes in AntarcticaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011
- Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries managementProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2010
- The risk to fishery performance associated with spatially resolved management of Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) harvestingICES Journal of Marine Science, 2009
- An equilibrium model for predicting the efficacy of marine protected areas in coastal environmentsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2007
- Ideal free distributions in fleet dynamics: a behavioral perspective on vessel movement in fisheries analysisCanadian Journal of Zoology, 2003
- Do Commercial Fishers Aggregate around Marine Reserves? Evidence from Big Creek Marine Ecological Reserve, Central CaliforniaNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 2003