Preference assessment of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: is 35 years a rational cutoff?
- 14 November 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Prenatal Diagnosis
- Vol. 22 (13), 1195-1200
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.494
Abstract
Objective To compare the perceptions of miscarriage and birth of a child with Down syndrome among pregnant women and to evaluate the implications of these preferences for the traditional 35‐year old maternal age risk boundary. Methods An interviewer‐administered survey was given to 186 pregnant women receiving antepartum care at a university hospital. Preferences, as reflected by utilities, for birth of a child with Down syndrome and pregnancy miscarriage, stratified by patient characteristics, were assessed. Results The utility for the birth of a child with Down syndrome decreased (p < 0.001) as clinical severity increased from mild (0.78) to severe (0.65). Miscarriage of a pregnancy had a mean utility of 0.76 ± 0.31. Women who desired prenatal diagnosis had a utility value for miscarriage (0.79 ± 0.28) that was significantly higher than for the birth of a child with Down syndrome of unknown severity (0.73 ± 0.27). In multivariable logistic regression, desire for prenatal diagnosis was the only factor associated with a preference of miscarriage over birth of an affected child (odds ratio 2.26, 95% confidence interval 1.03, 4.96). Conclusion Women who desire prenatal diagnosis do not perceive the birth of a child with Down syndrome and a pregnancy miscarriage to be equivalent health states. This finding calls into question the rationale of the 35‐year‐old maternal age criterion and suggests that actual patient preferences should be better incorporated into the decision to offer definitive prenatal diagnosis. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Procedure-related miscarriages and down syndrome–affected births: implications for prenatal testing based on women's preferencesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2000
- Inconsistencies in the "Societal Perspective" on Costs of the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and MedicineMedical Decision Making, 1999
- Justifying Prenatal Screening and Genetic Amniocentesis Programs by Cost-Effectiveness AnalysesMedical Decision Making, 1996
- Current Maternal Age Recommendations for Prenatal Diagnosis: A Reappraisal Using the Expected Utility TheoryFetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 1995
- Preferences of pregnant women for amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling for prenatal testing: Comparison of patients' choices and those of a decision-analytic modelJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1994
- A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Amniocentesis and Chorionic Villus Sampling for Prenatal Genetic TestingMedical Care, 1994
- Methodology for measuring health-state preferences—II: Scaling methodsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1989
- Utilities and Quality-Adjusted Life YearsInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 1989
- Decision making during the prenatal diagnostic procedure. A questionnaire and interview study of 211 women participating in prenatal diagnosisPrenatal Diagnosis, 1988
- The utility of different health states as perceived by the general publicJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1978