Comparative characterization of the cellular uptake and photodynamic efficiency of Foscan® and Fospeg in a human prostate cancer cell line
- 31 December 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier BV in Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy
- Vol. 9 (4), 344-354
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2012.03.008
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fluorescence localization and kinetics of mTHPC and liposomal formulations of mTHPC in the window‐chamber tumor modelLasers in Surgery and Medicine, 2011
- Photophysical evaluation of mTHPC-loaded HSA nanoparticles as novel PDT delivery systemsJournal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 2010
- Temoporfin-loaded liposomes: Physicochemical characterizationEuropean Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2010
- Comparative in vitro study on the characteristics of different photosensitizers employed in PDTJournal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 2010
- Biphasic Dose Response in Low Level Light TherapyDose-Response, 2009
- Unusual Photoinduced Response of mTHPC Liposomal Formulation (Foslip)Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2009
- Photocytotoxicity of mTHPC (Temoporfin) Loaded Polymeric Micelles Mediated by Lipase Catalyzed DegradationPharmaceutical Research, 2008
- Relationship between subcellular localisation of Foscan® and caspase activation in photosensitised MCF-7 cellsBritish Journal of Cancer, 2007
- Photophysical Parameters, Photosensitizer Retention and Tissue Optical Properties Completely Account for the Higher Photodynamic Efficacy of meso-Tetra-Hydroxyphenyl-Chlorin vs Photofrin¶Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2005
- Subcellular localization of meta-tetra(hydroxyphenyl)chlorin in human tumor cells subjected to photodynamic treatmentJournal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 1999