The Relative Merits of Population‐Based and Targeted Prevention Strategies
- 21 November 2008
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Milbank Quarterly
- Vol. 86 (4), 557-580
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2008.00534.x
Abstract
Preventive medicine has historically favored reducing a risk factor by a small amount in the entire population rather than by a large amount in high-risk individuals. The use of multivariable risk prediction tools, however, may affect the relative merits of this strategy. This study uses risk factor data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III to simulate a population of more than 100 million Americans aged thirty or older with no history of CV disease. Three strategies that could affect CV events, CV mortality, and quality-adjusted life years were examined: (1) a population-based strategy that treats all individuals with a low- or moderate-intensity intervention (in which the low-intensity intervention represents a public health campaign with no demonstrable adverse effects), (2) a targeted strategy that treats individuals in the top 25 percent based on a single risk factor (LDL), and (3) a risk-targeted strategy that treats individuals in the top 25 percent based on overall CV risk (as predicted by a multivariable prediction tool). The efficiency of each strategy was compared while varying the intervention's intensity and associated adverse effects, and the accuracy of the risk prediction tool. The LDL-targeted strategy and the low-intensity population-based strategy were comparable for CV events prevented over five years (0.79 million and 0.75 million, respectively), as were the risk-targeted strategy and moderate-intensity population-based strategy (1.56 million and 1.87 million, respectively). The risk-targeted strategy, however, was more efficient than the moderate-intensity population-based strategy (number needed to treat [NNT] 19 vs. 62). Incorporating a small degree of treatment-related adverse effects greatly magnified the relative advantages of the risk-targeted approach over other strategies. Reducing the accuracy of the prediction tool only modestly decreased this greater efficiency. A population-based prevention strategy can be an excellent option if an intervention has almost no adverse effects. But if the intervention has even a small degree of disutility, a targeted approach using multivariable risk prediction can prevent more morbidity and mortality while treating many fewer people.Keywords
This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reporting Clinical Trial Results To Inform Providers, Payers, And ConsumersHealth Affairs, 2005
- Distribution of Major Health Risks: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease StudyPLoS Medicine, 2004
- MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol lowering with simvastatin in 20 536 high-risk individuals: a randomised placebocontrolled trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Patient-assigned health state utilities for depression-related outcomes: differences by depression severity and antidepressant medicationsJournal of Affective Disorders, 1998
- Effectiveness of coronary heart disease risk management in high-risk patientsClinical Cardiology, 1994
- Cardiovascular disease risk profilesAmerican Heart Journal, 1991
- Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease *1Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution biasThe Lancet, 1990
- INTERSALT study findings. Public health and medical care implications.Hypertension, 1989
- PROJECTED EFFECTS OF HIGH-RISK VERSUS POPULATION-BASED PREVENTION STRATEGIES IN CORONARY HEART DISEASEAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- Sick Individuals and Sick PopulationsInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1985