Some suggestions about appropriate use of the Kruskal–Wallis test
- 30 September 2008
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier BV in Animal Behaviour
- Vol. 76 (3), 1083-1087
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.04.011
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measures of sociality: two different views of group sizeAnimal Behaviour, 2008
- Time for some a priori thinking about post hoc testingBehavioral Ecology, 2008
- Why do we use pooled variance analysis of variance?Pharmaceutical Statistics, 2005
- The Kruskal-Wallis Test and Stochastic HomogeneityJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1998
- Box-Type Approximations in Nonparametric Factorial DesignsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1997
- Univariate and Multivariate Omnibus Hypothesis Tests Selected to Control Type I Error Rates When Population Variances Are Not Necessarily EqualReview of Educational Research, 1996
- A New and Simpler Approximation for ANOVA Under Variance HeterogeneityJournal of Educational Statistics, 1994
- Type I error rates for James's second‐order test and Wilcox's Hm test under heteroscedasticity and non‐normalityBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1992
- Comparisons of Treatments After an Analysis of Variance in EcologyEcological Monographs, 1989
- Comparison of ANOVA alternatives under variance heterogeneity and specific noncentrality structures.Psychological Bulletin, 1986