Point:Counterpoint: High-frequency ventilation is/is not the optimal physiological approach to ventilate ARDS patients
Open Access
- 1 April 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Applied Physiology
- Vol. 104 (4), 1230-1231
- https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01226.2007
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infantsPublished by Wiley ,2007
- A protocol for high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults: Results from a roundtable discussion*Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- Tidal volume delivery during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome*Critical Care Medicine, 2007
- THE CONTRIBUTION OF BIOPHYSICAL LUNG INJURY TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF BIOTRAUMAAnnual Review of Physiology, 2006
- The concept of “baby lung”Intensive Care Medicine, 2005
- High frequency oscillatory ventilation compared with conventional mechanical ventilation in adult respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN24242669]Critical Care, 2005
- Cumulative Metaanalysis of High-frequency Versus Conventional Ventilation in Premature NeonatesAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- Major benefit of small tidal volumes during high-frequency ventilation *Critical Care Medicine, 2003
- High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in AdultsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2002
- Ventilator-induced Lung InjuryAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1998