An Assessment of GCM Skill in Simulating Persistence across Multiple Time Scales
Open Access
- 15 July 2011
- journal article
- Published by American Meteorological Society in Journal of Climate
- Vol. 24 (14), 3609-3623
- https://doi.org/10.1175/2011jcli3732.1
Abstract
Climate change impact studies for water resource applications, such as the development of projections of reservoir yields or the assessment of likely frequency and amplitude of drought under a future climate, require that the year-to-year persistence in a range of hydrological variables such as catchment average rainfall be properly represented. This persistence is often attributable to low-frequency variability in the global sea surface temperature (SST) field and other large-scale climate variables through a complex sequence of teleconnections. To evaluate the capacity of general circulation models (GCMs) to accurately represent this low-frequency variability, a set of wavelet-based skill measures has been developed to compare GCM performance in representing interannual variability with the observed global SST data, as well as to assess the extent to which this variability is imparted in precipitation and surface pressure anomaly fields. A validation of the derived skill measures is performed using GCM precipitation as an input in a reservoir storage context, with the accuracy of reservoir storage estimates shown to be improved by using GCM outputs that correctly represent the observed low-frequency variability. Significant differences in the performance of different GCMs is demonstrated, suggesting that judicious selection of models is required if the climate impact assessment is sensitive to low-frequency variability. The two GCMs that were found to exhibit the most appropriate representation of global low-frequency variability for individual variables assessed were the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV) ECHAM4 and L’Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace Coupled Model, version 4 (IPSL CM4); when considering all three variables, the Max Planck Institute (MPI) ECHAM5 performed well. Importantly, models that represented interannual variability well for SST also performed well for the other two variables, while models that performed poorly for SST also had consistently low skill across the remaining variables.Keywords
This publication has 50 references indexed in Scilit:
- El Niño–Induced Tropical Droughts in Climate Change ProjectionsJournal of Climate, 2009
- Rainfall Teleconnections with Indo-Pacific Variability in the WCRP CMIP3 ModelsJournal of Climate, 2009
- Multi-scale variability patterns in NCEP/NCAR reanalysis sea-level pressureTheoretical and Applied Climatology, 2008
- Ensembles and probabilities: a new era in the prediction of climate changePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2007
- Using regional climate model data to simulate historical and future river flows in northwest EnglandClimatic Change, 2007
- Pan‐oceanic response to increasing anthropogenic aerosols: Impacts on the Southern Hemisphere oceanic circulationGeophysical Research Letters, 2006
- ENSO simulation in coupled ocean-atmosphere models: are the current models better?Climate Dynamics, 2006
- Limited sensitivity analysis of regional climate change probabilities for the 21st centuryJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2005
- The Version-2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) Monthly Precipitation Analysis (1979–Present)Journal of Hydrometeorology, 2003
- Ten Lectures on WaveletsPublished by Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics (SIAM) ,1992