Defining Addiction: Contrasting Views of Clients and Experts
- 1 January 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Informa UK Limited in Addiction Research
- Vol. 8 (3), 211-220
- https://doi.org/10.3109/16066350009004421
Abstract
Clients enrolled in a drug education class and fellows of Division SO (Division on Addictions) of the American Psychological Association were asked to define the concept of addiction. Although opinions varied, clients tended to view addiction in terms of needs, urges, and diminished control whereas expert definitions focused on the compulsive aspects of the behavior, the presence of physical dependence, and like the clients frequently emphasized diminished control. Experts were significantly more likely to express dissatisfaction with the concept of addiction, which along with the fact that no single criterion was endorsed by more than half of either group, raises serious questions about the practical utility and scientific merit of this enigmatic concept.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Lay theories of heroin addictionSocial Science & Medicine, 1996
- Failings of the disease model of addictionHuman Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental, 1996
- The DSM-IV field trial for substance use disorders: major resultsDrug and Alcohol Dependence, 1995
- Diagnosis and treatment of sexual addictionJournal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 1993
- The Disease Controversy Revisited: An Ontologic PerspectiveJournal of Drug Issues, 1993
- The Austere Ideology of Folk PsychologyMind & Language, 1993
- Addiction: The Troublesome ConceptJournal of Drug Issues, 1991
- Addiction: definition and implicationsBritish Journal of Addiction, 1990
- Lay theories of the causes of alcoholismPsychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 1984
- Heavy smokers', light smokers', and nonsmokers' beliefs about cigarette smoking.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1982