Using a realist approach to evaluate smoking cessation interventions targeting pregnant women and young people
Open Access
- 23 February 2010
- journal article
- Published by Springer Science and Business Media LLC in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 10 (1), 49
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-49
Abstract
Background This paper describes a study protocol designed to evaluate a programme of smoking cessation interventions targeting pregnant women and young people living in urban and rural locations in Northeast Scotland. The study design was developed on so-called 'realist' evaluation principles, which are concerned with the implementation of interventions as well as their outcomes. Methods/design A two-phased study was designed based on the Theory of Change (TOC) using mixed methods to assess both process and outcome factors. The study was designed with input from the relevant stakeholders. The mixed-methods approach consists of semi-structured interviews with planners, service providers, service users and non-users. These qualitative interviews will be analysed using a thematic framework approach. The quantitative element of the study will include the analysis of routinely collected data and specific project monitoring data, such as data on service engagement, service use, quit rates and changes in smoking status. Discussion The process of involving key stakeholders was conducted using logic modelling and TOC tools. Engaging stakeholders, including those responsible for funding, developing and delivering, and those intended to benefit from interventions aimed at them, in their evaluation design, are considered by many to increase the validity and rigour of the subsequent evidence generated. This study is intended to determine not only the components and processes, but also the possible effectiveness of this set of health interventions, and contribute to the evidence base about smoking cessation interventions aimed at priority groups in Scotland. It is also anticipated that this study will contribute to the ongoing debate about the role and challenges of 'realist' evaluation approaches in general, and the utility of logic modelling and TOC approaches in particular, for evaluation of complex health interventions.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidanceBMJ, 2008
- Beyond evidence--to ethics: a decision-making framework for health promotion, public health and health improvementHealth Promotion International, 2008
- Getting it right: designing adolescent‐centred smoking cessation servicesAddiction, 2007
- Developing a Stakeholder-Driven Anticipated Timeline of Impact for Evaluation of Social ProgramsAmerican Journal of Evaluation, 2006
- Legislation on smoking in enclosed public places in Scotland: how will we evaluate the impact?Journal of Public Health, 2006
- Responsive evaluation in health promotion: its value for ambiguous contextsHealth Promotion International, 2005
- Pregnant women's perception of the implementation of smoking cessation adviceHealth Education Journal, 2002
- Criteria for evaluating evidence on public health interventionsJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2002
- An Evaluation Framework for Health Promotion: Theory, Quality and EffectivenessEvaluation, 2000
- Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.American Journal of Public Health, 1999